Overview

Hi all, Like others my app submission has been stuck in “waiting for review” for weeks. I know initial app reviews take longer than updates, but this has been delayed far too long and makes me concerned about repeating the process in the future. I submitted this app for review back on Feb 10. It was initially rejected for a minor issue, which I resolved and resubmitted the same day. After that, the build remained in “Waiting for Review” for about two weeks with no further communication. At that point I canceled the submission and resubmitted the build, thinking it may have been stuck in the queue (I now know not to do this next time). Unfortunately the new submission has also been waiting for review for another 9 days now with no messages or updates. I’ve contacted app review support as well (case ID- 102826632729). I understand review times can vary, but delays like this make it difficult for developers to plan launches or push updates when the review process is the only path to distributing apps. As paying members of the Apple Developer Program, we rely heavily on this pipeline functioning reliably. Hoping this post will reach someone from Apple who can help move the process along. If any other devs have suggestions/tips that have worked for them, please share so others in this position can become unblocked. Thanks in advance.

Hi, After the release of macOS Tahoe 26.2. We are seeing memory leaks if our Network Protection Extension is used alongside the Apple Built In Firewall, a second Security Solution that does Network Protection and a VPN. Our NEXT, socketfilterfw and the other security solution consume instead of a few MB of Memory now multiple Gigabytes of Memory. This issue started with the public release of macOS Tahoe 26.2, this issue was not present in earlier versions of macOS and the same set of Software. Just testing our solution by itself will not show this behavior. I unfortunately can't try to reproduce the issue on my test device that runs the latest 26.3 beta as I do not have the third party software installed there and I can't get it. Our Network extension implements depending on the license and enabled features: NEFilterDataProvider NEDNSProxyProvider NETransparentProxyProvider For all man in the middle Use Cases we are using Network Framework, to communicate with the peers. And leaks suggest that the there is a memory leak within internals of the Network Framework. Here is a shortened sample of the leaks output of our Network extension. However, the third party NEXT does show the same leaks. More details can be found on the Feedback with the ID FB21649104 snippet is blocking post? sensitive language Does anyone see similar issues or has an idea what could cause this issue, except a regression of the Network.framework introduced with macOS Tahoe 26.2? Best Regards, Timo

Have tried to join the developer programme and says its still pending after 3 days. Anyone any idea how long the procedure takes??

Hello, I'm working on a game that features online multiplayer. The game is developed using Unity and Apple Unity plugins. The "isUnderAge" property restricts the online multiplayer feature. Everything works as expected on all platforms (Mac, iPhone, iPad, AppleTV, and visionPro) except on Macs equipped with an Intel chip. Using the same iCloud and GameCenter, with no restrictions enabled, "isUnderAge" returns false, as expected, but on Mac equipped with an Intel chip, it returns true. Is there any restriction or compatibility issue with those chips? Is there a workaround? Thanks

The documentation specifies that when Contacts framework returns unified contacts that each fetched unified contact object (CNContact) has its own unique identifier that’s different from any individual contact’s identifier in the set of linked contacts and that when refetching a unified contact, that this identifier should be used. There is also an analogous identifier within the list of contactRelations, but each of these don't seem to corespondent to the unified contacts. For example, is a new contact (Sheryl Zakroff) is created in the simulator Contacts and their spouse is set to Hank Zakroff. However, the GUID created for the contactRelations identifier does not correlate to the original Hank Zakroff GUID and cannot be searched. Is this a bug or what is the indent of the contactRelations identifier? Here's a debug output of walking the unifiedContacts: Name: Hank Zakroff 2E73EE73-C03F-4D5F-B1E8-44E85A70F170 - Other : (555) 766-4823 - Other : (707) 555-1854 Name: David Taylor E94CD15C-7964-4A9B-8AC4-10D7CFB791FD - Other : 555-610-6679 Name: Sheryl Zakroff DE783BC8-7917-4138-93F6-3AF0FD4CE083 - Other : (707) 555-1854 - Spouse: <CNContactRelation: 0x60000000dd60: name=Hank M. Zakroff> - 534B467D-CA00-46D3-897C-16EEA782C9CF - Looking for ["534B467D-CA00-46D3-897C-16EEA782C9CF"] []

Description: I’m encountering an issue where the Apple Watch’s watchOS version is lower than the deployment target specified in my Xcode project. For example, my Watch device is running watchOS 10.6, but my app’s deployment target is set to watchOS 9.6 or 10.6, and Xcode shows an error stating: Error: “watchOS version doesn’t match the app’s deployment target.” Could someone clarify how to properly handle this version mismatch? Environment: Xcode 26 iPhone: iOS 18 Apple Watch: watchOS 10.6 Any guidance or best practices would be appreciated.

I'm experiencing a contradictory validation issue with DeviceActivityReportExtension that creates an impossible situation: The Problem: Without NSExtensionPrincipalClass in Info.plist → App Store Connect rejects upload with: "Missing Info.plist values. No values for NSExtensionMainStoryboard or NSExtensionPrincipalClass found" With NSExtensionPrincipalClass → Local install fails with: "defines either an NSExtensionMainStoryboard or NSExtensionPrincipalClass key, which is not allowed for the extension point com.apple.deviceactivityui.report-extension" Setup: Extension point: com.apple.deviceactivityui.report-extension Using SwiftUI with @main attribute and DeviceActivityReportExtension protocol Xcode 16.2, iOS 17.6 deployment target Code structure: @main struct SpoolReport: DeviceActivityReportExtension { var body: some DeviceActivityReportScene { // Report scenes here } } The extension builds and runs perfectly without NSExtensionPrincipalClass, but cannot be uploaded to App Store Connect. Adding the key allows upload but breaks local installation. Is this a known issue? Is there a workaround or correct Info.plist configuration for DeviceActivityReportExtension? Thank you!

I installed xcode 16 and both Predictive Code Completion Model and iOS 18.0 Simulator Failed Download. I can live without the code completion, but I can not get any Simulator to install. I clicked of the info button and it shows the following: Download failed. Domain: DVTDownloadableErrorDomain Code: 41 User Info: { DVTErrorCreationDateKey = "2024-09-30 15:57:24 +0000"; } Download failed. Domain: DVTDownloadableErrorDomain Code: 41 Failed fetching catalog for assetType (com.apple.MobileAsset.iOSSimulatorRuntime), serverParameters ({ RequestedBuild = 22A3351; }) Domain: DVTDownloadsUtilitiesErrorDomain Code: -1 Download failed as the server said authentication failed. (Catalog download for com.apple.MobileAsset.iOSSimulatorRuntime) Domain: com.apple.MobileAssetError.Download Code: 41 User Info: { checkServer = 1; } System Information macOS Version 15.0 (Build 24A335) Xcode 16.0 (23051) (Build 16A242d) Timestamp: 2024-09-30T10:57:24-05:00

I'm on macOS Sequoia Version 15.7.3 (24G419) and using Xcode Version 26.2 (17C52). In my Xcode project, Transaction.updates and Product.SubscriptionInfo.Status.updates don’t seem to emit updates reliably. The code below works consistently in a fresh Xcode project using a minimal setup with a local StoreKit Configuration file containing a single auto-renewable subscription. class InAppPurchaseManager { static let shared = InAppPurchaseManager() var transactionTask: Task<Void, Never>? var subscriptionTask: Task<Void, Never>? init() { print("Launched InAppPurchaseManager...") transactionTask = Task(priority: .background) { for await result in Transaction.updates { print("\nReceived transaction update...") try? await result.payloadValue.finish() } } subscriptionTask = Task(priority: .background) { for await result in Product.SubscriptionInfo.Status.updates { print("\nReceived subscription update...") print("state:", result.state.localizedDescription) } } } } I initialise it in: func applicationDidFinishLaunching(_ aNotification: Notification) { _ = InAppPurchaseManager.shared } I do not build any UI for this test. I open StoreKit Transaction Manager then click Create Transaction → select the product → choose Purchase (Default) → Next → Done. The console shows that it detects the initial purchase, renewals and finishes each transaction. It also works even if I do not add the In-App Purchase capability. In my actual project, the initial purchase is detected and finished, but renewals are not detected. Subsequent transactions then appear as unverified, presumably because the updates are not being observed so the transactions are not being finished. What can I do to make this work reliably in my actual project? For context, in the actual project: I have a StoreKit Configuration file that is synced with App Store Connect The In-App Purchase capability is enabled The configuration file is selected in the scheme The products in App Store Connect show “Ready to Submit” Loading products works: try await Product.products(for: ...) Also, I use ProductView for the purchase UI. The first purchase works and is detected and finished, but subsequent renewals are not finished because the updates do not seem to be emitted.

My app has been in “Waiting for Review” since January 31. I already submitted a support case (id - 102819325365) last week, but haven’t received a response. I also requested an expedited review but with no response either. This is not a new app, and all previous submissions were completed in less than 48 hours, so this delay seems unusual.

I'm struggling to understand whether TextField handles undo by itself, or how to properly handle it myself. In a macOS app with a SwiftUI lifecycle, in a DocumentGroup scene, I'm using both TextEditors and Textfields. The text editors handle undo out of the box, with undo coalescing. The text fields seem not to. However, on occasion, they do create undo points, leaving me confused as to what conditions are needed for that to happen. Is there a way to reliably get text fields to handle undo on their own? Or, how should I implement typing undo, including undo coalescing, manually?

Updated version of this post My HomePod mini is now on version 16.4, so the the temperature and humidity sensors are enabled. The data properly shows up in the Home app on my various devices. In my HomeKit iPad app running on Mac Catalyst, however, the data does not show up. I would expect the HomePod mini to show up in HMHome.accessories with a service of type HMServiceTypeTempatureSensor. I see all of my other HomeKit accessories, just not the HomePod mini. I have tried with the latest Xcode (14.3) and highest available iOS Target and Minimum Deployment (16.4), macOS version 13.3. I have not, as of this writing, upgraded my HomeKit architecture, however. Note that I haven't tried the app on an actual iPad (and the iOS simulator doesn't expose my HomeKit environment.)

During Apple Pay in-app provisioning (EV_ECC_v2), our iOS app successfully obtains the issuer provisioning certificates and generates cryptographic material. The flow fails when Apple posts the card blob to Apple’s broker (card creation step), returning HTTP 500 from .../broker/v4/devices/{SEID}/cards. Steps: Call issuerProvisioningCertificates?encryptionVersion=EV_ECC_v2 → 200 OK; returns ECC leaf + Apple Root CA chain; nonce=2a831be4. 2. Build {encryptedCardData, activationData, ephemeralPublicKey} 3. POST /broker/v4/devices/{SEID}/cards Expected: 200 OK on /broker/v4/devices/{SEID}/cards, or 5xx with a descriptive error if payload/cryptography is invalid. Observed: 500 Internal Server Error from Apple broker on /cards (labeled “eligibility” in PassKit logs), causing a terminal failure in Wallet UI.

Hello all, I am trying to submit a request for endpoint security entitlement. I keep getting this error for weeks: This page isn’t working developer.apple.com is currently unable to handle this request. HTTP ERROR 500

NSWindow objects with custom styleMask configurations seem to behave erratically in macOS Tahoe 26.3 RC. For example an NSWindow is not resizable after issuing .styleMask.remove(.titled) or some NSWindow-s become totally unresponsive (the NSWindow becomes transparent to mouse events) with custom styleMask-s. This is a radical change compared to how all previous macOS versions or the 26.3 beta3 worked and seriously affects apps that might use custom NSWindows - this includes some system utilities, OSD/HUD apps etc, actually breaking some apps. Such fundamental compatibility altering changes should not be introduced in an RC stage (if this is intentional and not a bug) imho.

MacOS(Apple Silicon) IOKit driver for FPGA DMA transmission, kernel panic. Hardware and software configuration: MAC mini M1 2020 16GB, macOS Ventura 13.0 or 13.7.8 FPGA device capability: 64-bit Complete description: We've developed a DMA driver for PCIe devices (FPGA) based on IOKit. The driver can start normally through kextload, and the bar mapping, DMA registers, etc. are all correct. I am testing DMA data transmission, but a kernel panic has occurred. The specific content of the panic is as follows: {"bug_type":"210","timestamp":"2026-01-28 14:35:30.00 +0800","os_version":"macOS 13.0 (22A380)","roots_installed":0,"incident_id":"61C9B820-8D1B-4E75-A4EB-10DC2558FA75"} { "build" : "macOS 13.0 (22A380)", "product" : "Macmini9,1", "socId" : "0x00008103", "kernel" : "Darwin Kernel Version 22.1.0: Sun Oct 9 20:14:30 PDT 2022; root:xnu-8792.41.9~2/RELEASE_ARM64_T8103", "incident" : "61C9B820-8D1B-4E75-A4EB-10DC2558FA75", "crashReporterKey" : "6435F6BD-4138-412A-5142-83DD7E5B4F61", "date" : "2026-01-28 14:35:30.16 +0800", "panicString" : "panic(cpu 0 caller 0xfffffe0026c78c2c): "apciec[pcic0-bridge]::handleInterrupt: Request address is greater than 32 bits linksts=0x99000001 pcielint=0x02220060 linkcdmsts=0x00000000 (ltssm 0x11=L0)\n" @AppleT8103PCIeCPort.cpp:1301\nDebugger message: panic\nMemory ID: 0x6\nOS release type: User\nOS version: 22A380\nKernel version: Darwin Kernel Version 22.1.0: Sun Oct 9 20:14:30 PDT 2022; root:xnu-8792.41.9~2/RELEASE_ARM64_T8103\nFileset Kernelcache UUID: C222B4132B9708E5E0E2E8B8C5896410\nKernel UUID: 0BFE6A5D-118B-3889-AE2B-D34A0117A062\nBoot session UUID: 61C9B820-8D1B-4E75-A4EB-10DC2558FA75\niBoot version: iBoot-8419.41.10\nsecure boot?: YES\nroots installed: 0\nPaniclog version: 14\nKernelCache slide: 0x000000001d1b4000\nKernelCache base: 0xfffffe00241b8000\nKernel slide: 0x000000001e3f8000\nKernel text base: 0xfffffe00253fc000\nKernel text exec slide: 0x000000001e4e0000\nKernel text exec base: 0xfffffe00254e4000\nmach_absolute_time: 0x907c3082\nEpoch Time: sec usec\n Boot : 0x6979adbb 0x00023a6a\n Sleep : 0x00000000 0x00000000\n Wake : 0x00000000 0x00000000\n Calendar: 0x6979ae1a 0x00064953\n\nZone info:\n Zone map: 0xfffffe1000834000 - 0xfffffe3000834000\n . VM : 0xfffffe1000834000 - 0xfffffe14cd500000\n . RO : 0xfffffe14cd500000 - 0xfffffe1666e98000\n . GEN0 : 0xfffffe1666e98000 - 0xfffffe1b33b64000\n . GEN1 : 0xfffffe1b33b64000 - 0xfffffe2000830000\n . GEN2 : 0xfffffe2000830000 - 0xfffffe24cd4fc000\n . GEN3 : 0xfffffe24cd4fc000 - 0xfffffe299a1c8000\n . DATA : 0xfffffe299a1c8000 - 0xfffffe3000834000\n Metadata: 0xfffffe3f4d1ac000 - 0xfffffe3f551ac000\n Bitmaps : 0xfffffe3f551ac000 - 0xfffffe3f5ac94000\n\nCORE 0 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569d7a0\nCORE 1 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569eea0\nCORE 2 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569eea0\nCORE 3 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569eea0\nCORE 4 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569eea0\nCORE 5 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569eea0\nCORE 6 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569eea0\nCORE 7 recently retired instr at 0xfffffe002569eea0\nTPIDRx_ELy = {1: 0xfffffe2000c23010 0: 0x0000000000000000 0ro: 0x0000000000000000 }\nCORE 0 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 1 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 2 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 3 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 4 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 5 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 6 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 7 PVH locks held: None\nCORE 0 is the one that panicked. Check the full backtrace for details.\nCORE 1: PC=0xfffffe00279db94c, LR=0xfffffe00260d5d9c, FP=0xfffffe8ffecaf850\nCORE 2: PC=0xfffffe0025be76b0, LR=0xfffffe0025be7628, FP=0xfffffe8fff08f5f0\nCORE 3: PC=0x00000001c7cacd78, LR=0x00000001c7cacd84, FP=0x000000016f485130\nCORE 4: PC=0xfffffe002557f55c, LR=0xfffffe002557f55c, FP=0xfffffe8ffe1dff00\nCORE 5: PC=0xfffffe002557f55c, LR=0xfffffe002557f55c, FP=0xfffffe8fff5eff00\nCORE 6: PC=0xfffffe002557f55c, LR=0xfffffe002557f55c, FP=0xfffffe8ffed8bf00\nCORE 7: PC=0xfffffe002557f55c, LR=0xfffffe002557f55c, FP=0xfffffe8fff11bf00\nCompressor Info: 0% of compressed pages limit (OK) and 0% of segments limit (OK) with 0 swapfiles and OK swap space\nPanicked task 0xfffffe1b33aad678: 0 pages, 470 threads: pid 0: kernel_task\nPanicked thread: 0xfffffe2000c23010, backtrace: 0xfffffe8fff6eb6a0, tid: 265\n\t\t ... Kernel Extensions in backtrace:\n com.apple.driver.AppleT8103PCIeC(1.0)[A595D104-026A-39E5-93AA-4C87CE8C14D2]@0xfffffe0026c619d0->0xfffffe0026c86c97\n dependency: com.apple.driver.AppleARMPlatform(1.0.2)[11A9713E-6739-3A4C-8571-2D8EAA062278]@0xfffffe0025f13ff0->0xfffffe0025f6255f\n dependency: com.apple.driver.AppleEmbeddedPCIE(1)[E71CBCCD-AEB8-3E7B-933D-4FED4241BF13]@0xfffffe002654e0b0->0xfffffe00265684c7\n dependency: com.apple.driver.ApplePIODMA(1)[A419BABC-A7A3-316D-A150-7C2C2D1F6D53]@0xfffffe00269a24b0->0xfffffe00269a6c3b\n dependency: com.apple.driver.IODARTFamily(1)[03997E20-8A3F-3412-A4E8-BD968A75A07D]@0xfffffe00275bcf50->0xfffffe00275d0a3f\n dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.9)[EC78F47B-530B-3F87-854E-0A0A5FD9BBB2]@0xfffffe0027934350->0xfffffe002795f3d3\n dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOReportFamily(47)[843B39D3-146E-3992-B7C7-960148685DC8]@0xfffffe0027963010->0xfffffe0027965ffb\n dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOThunderboltFamily(9.3.3)[B22BC005-BB7B-32A3-99C0-39F3BDBD8E54]@0xfffffe0027a5e3f0->0xfffffe0027b9a1a3\n\nlast started kext at 1915345919: com.sobb.pcie-dma\t1.0.0d1 (addr 0xfffffe00240e47f0, size 9580)\nlast stopped kext at 1774866338: com.sobb.pcie-dma\t1.0.0d1 (addr 0xfffffe00240e47f0, size 9580)\nloaded It seems that the DMA request address initiated by FPGA exceeded 32 bits, which was intercepted by PCIe root port and resulted in a kernel panic.This is also the case on macOS (M2). I have tried the following code interface: IOBufferMemoryDescriptor： a. withCapacity(bufferSize, kIODirectionInOut, true)； b. inTaskWithPhysicalMask(kernel_task, kIODirectionInOut, bufferSize, 0x00000000FFFFFFFFULL)。 The physical addresses of the constructed descriptors are all >32 bits; IODMACommand： a. withSpecification(kIODMACommandOutputHost64, 64, 0, IODMACommand::kMapped, 0, 0)，gen64IOVMSegments() The allocated IOVM address must be>32 bits, which will generate a kernel panic when used later. b.withSpecification(kIODMACommandOutputHost32, 32, 0, IODMACommand::kMapped, 0, 0)，gen32IOVMSegments() The allocation of IOVM failed with error code kIOReturnenMessageTooLarge. So after the above attempts, the analysis shows that the strategy of Dart+PCIe root port on macOS (Apple Silicon) is causing the failure of 64 bit DMA address transfer. I have two questions: a. Does Dart in macOS (Apple Silicon) definitely not allocate <=32-bit IOVM addresses? b. Is there any other way to achieve DMA transfer for FGPA devices on macOS (Apple Silicon)? Thanks！

I’m developing a share extension for iOS 26 with Xcode 26. When the extension’s sheet appears, it always shows a full white background, even though iOS 26 introduces a new “Liquid Glass” effect for partial sheets. Expected: The sheet background should use the iOS 26 glassmorphism effect as seen in full apps. Actual behavior: Custom sheets in my app get the glass effect, but the native system sheet in the share extension always opens as plain white. Steps to reproduce: Create a share extension using UIKit Present any UIViewController as the main view Set modalPresentationStyle = .pageSheet (or leave as default) Observe solid white background, not glassmorphism Sample code: swift override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() view.backgroundColor = .clear preferredContentSize = CGSize(width: UIScreen.main.bounds.width, height: 300) } Troubleshooting attempted: Tried adding UIVisualEffectView with system blur/materials Removed all custom backgrounds Set modalPresentationStyle explicitly Questions: Is it possible to enable or force the Liquid Glass effect in share extensions on iOS 26? Is this a limitation by design or a potential bug? Any workaround to make extension sheet backgrounds match system glass appearance?

Since the beta releases of iPadOS 26 we have been having some crashes about Invalid parameter not satisfying: parentEnvironment != nil We got to contact a couple of users and we found out that the crash appears when entering a screen in a UINavigationController with the iPad device connected to a Magic Keyboard. If the device is not connected to the keyboard then nothing happens and everything works ok. From our end we haven't managed to reproduce the crash so I am pasting part of the stacktrace if it can be of any help. 3 UIKitCore 0x19dfd2e14 -[_UIFocusContainerGuideFallbackItemsContainer initWithParentEnvironment:childItems:] + 224 (_UIFocusContainerGuideFallbackItemsContainer.m:23) 4 UIKitCore 0x19dae3108 -[_UIFocusContainerGuideImpl _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 368 (_UIFocusGuideImpl.m:246) 5 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 6 UIKitCore 0x19db28900 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainers:] + 160 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:545) 7 UIKitCore 0x19d1313dc _UIFocusRegionSearchContextSearchForFocusRegionsInEnvironment + 632 (_UIFocusRegion.m:143) 8 UIKitCore 0x19db1d244 -[_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 140 (_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy.m:184) 9 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 10 UIKitCore 0x19d1320fc _UIFocusItemContainerAddChildItemsInContextWithOptions + 596 (UIFocusItemContainer.m:183) 11 UIKitCore 0x19d131b98 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextAddChildItemsInEnvironmentContainer + 648 (_UIFocusRegion.m:108) 12 UIKitCore 0x19d131398 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextSearchForFocusRegionsInEnvironment + 564 (_UIFocusRegion.m:140) 13 UIKitCore 0x19db1d244 -[_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 140 (_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy.m:184) 14 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 15 UIKitCore 0x19d1320fc _UIFocusItemContainerAddChildItemsInContextWithOptions + 596 (UIFocusItemContainer.m:183) 16 UIKitCore 0x19d131b98 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextAddChildItemsInEnvironmentContainer + 648 (_UIFocusRegion.m:108) 17 UIKitCore 0x19d131398 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextSearchForFocusRegionsInEnvironment + 564 (_UIFocusRegion.m:140) 18 UIKitCore 0x19db1d244 -[_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 140 (_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy.m:184) 19 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 20 UIKitCore 0x19d1320fc _UIFocusItemContainerAddChildItemsInContextWithOptions + 596 (UIFocusItemContainer.m:183) 21 UIKitCore 0x19d131b98 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextAddChildItemsInEnvironmentContainer + 648 (_UIFocusRegion.m:108) 22 UIKitCore 0x19d131398 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextSearchForFocusRegionsInEnvironment + 564 (_UIFocusRegion.m:140) 23 UIKitCore 0x19db1d244 -[_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 140 (_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy.m:184) 24 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 25 UIKitCore 0x19d1320fc _UIFocusItemContainerAddChildItemsInContextWithOptions + 596 (UIFocusItemContainer.m:183) 26 UIKitCore 0x19d131b98 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextAddChildItemsInEnvironmentContainer + 648 (_UIFocusRegion.m:108) 27 UIKitCore 0x19d131398 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextSearchForFocusRegionsInEnvironment + 564 (_UIFocusRegion.m:140) 28 UIKitCore 0x19db1d244 -[_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 140 (_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy.m:184) 29 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 30 UIKitCore 0x19d1320fc _UIFocusItemContainerAddChildItemsInContextWithOptions + 596 (UIFocusItemContainer.m:183) 31 UIKitCore 0x19d131b98 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextAddChildItemsInEnvironmentContainer + 648 (_UIFocusRegion.m:108) 32 UIKitCore 0x19d131398 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextSearchForFocusRegionsInEnvironment + 564 (_UIFocusRegion.m:140) 33 UIKitCore 0x19db1d244 -[_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 140 (_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy.m:184) 34 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 35 UIKitCore 0x19d1320fc _UIFocusItemContainerAddChildItemsInContextWithOptions + 596 (UIFocusItemContainer.m:183) 36 UIKitCore 0x19d131b98 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextAddChildItemsInEnvironmentContainer + 648 (_UIFocusRegion.m:108) 37 UIKitCore 0x19d131398 _UIFocusRegionSearchContextSearchForFocusRegionsInEnvironment + 564 (_UIFocusRegion.m:140) 38 UIKitCore 0x19db1d244 -[_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy _searchForFocusRegionsInContext:] + 140 (_UIFocusRegionContainerProxy.m:184) 39 UIKitCore 0x19db28498 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot addRegionsInContainer:] + 2720 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:531) 40 UIKitCore 0x19d132e08 -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot _capture] + 424 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:403) 41 UIKitCore 0x19db2675c -[_UIFocusMapSnapshot _initWithSnapshotter:mapArea:searchArea:] + 476 (_UIFocusMapSnapshot.m:171) 42 UIKitCore 0x19d130dcc -[_UIFocusMapSnapshotter captureSnapshot] + 192 (_UIFocusMapSnapshotter.m:137) 43 UIKitCore 0x19db2045c -[_UIFocusMap _inferredDefaultFocusItemInEnvironment:] + 136 (_UIFocusMap.m:168) 44 UIKitCore 0x19daffd2c -[_UIFocusEnvironmentPreferenceEnumerationContext _inferPreferencesForEnvironment:] + 140 (_UIFocusEnvironmentPreferenceEnumerator.m:313) 45 UIKitCore 0x19d127ab4 -[_UIFocusEnvironmentPreferenceEnumerationContext _resolvePreferredFocusEnvironments] + 104 (_UIFocusEnvironmentPreferenceEnumerator.m:250) 46 UIKitCore 0x19d127394 -[_UIFocusEnvironmentPreferenceEnumerationContext preferredEnvironments] + 36 (_UIFocusEnvironmentPreferenceEnumerator.m:184) 47 UIKitCore 0x19d126e94 _enumeratePreferredFocusEnvironments + 400 (_UIFocusEnvironmentPreferenceEnumerator.m:503)

I work on some proprietary codebases and can only use private AI services with them (currently MiniMax M2.1 and GLM 4.7). It all works great with both Claude Code and OpenCode agents, and I'd like to leverage the new agentic capabilities that are now in Xcode 26.3. I'm not seeing any option to connect to OpenCode, and both the Anthropic and OpenAI providers require an enterprise account (which I don't have access to). Are there any options that I'm missing here?

I've recently installed 26.1 Beta 3 alongside stable 26.0.1 When building my app with 26.0.1 the final .ipa size is ~17mb, however after building my app with 26.1 Beta 3 the size has increased up to ~22mb The main difference is Assets.car blowing from 1.1mb to 5.6mb (or 8.6mb if I include all icons settings). Upon examining I've found new liquid glass .icon file duplicating itself multiple times as png variants (any, dark, tinted, etc). Is anyone else experiencing this issue?